<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 18:18:00 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Weird Studies - Episodes Tagged with “Kubrick”</title>
    <link>https://www.weirdstudies.com/tags/kubrick</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Professor Phil Ford and writer J. F. Martel host a series of conversations on art and philosophy, dwelling on ideas that are hard to think and art that opens up rifts in what we are pleased to call "reality."</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Art and philosophy at the limits of the thinkable</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Professor Phil Ford and writer J. F. Martel host a series of conversations on art and philosophy, dwelling on ideas that are hard to think and art that opens up rifts in what we are pleased to call "reality."</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>weird, art, philosophy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>admin@weirdstudies.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Arts"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 75: Our Old Friend the Monolith: On Stanley Kubrick's '2001: A Space Odyssey'</title>
  <link>https://www.weirdstudies.com/75</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">5784fc1f-2bd2-4117-b9ea-1a090a9eb645</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/5784fc1f-2bd2-4117-b9ea-1a090a9eb645.mp3" length="82890792" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>75</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Our Old Friend the Monolith: On Stanley Kubrick's '2001: A Space Odyssey'</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>JF and Phil discuss a film they've been bringing up since the beginning of the podcast: Kubrick's masterful 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968).</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:26:18</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;"You don't find reality only in your own backyard, you know," Stanley Kubrick once told an interviewer. "In fact, sometimes that's the last place you'll find it." Oddly, this episode of Weird Studies begins with Phil Ford hatching the idea of putting a replica of the  monolith from &lt;em&gt;2001&lt;/em&gt; in his backyard. As the ensuing discussion suggests, this would amount to putting reality -- or the Real, as we like to call it -- in the place where it may be least apparent. Perhaps that is what Kubrick did when he planted his monolithic film in thousands of movie theatres back in 1968. Moviegoers went in expecting a Kubrickian twist on &lt;em&gt;Buck Rogers&lt;/em&gt;; they came out &lt;em&gt;changed&lt;/em&gt; by the experience, much like the hominids of great veld in the "Dawn of Man" sequence that opens the film. This is what all great art does, and if you look closely, maybe &lt;em&gt;2001&lt;/em&gt; can tell you something about how it does it. Because in the end, the film &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the  monolith, and the monolith is all art.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;REFERENCES&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Stanley Kubrick (dir.), &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;2001: A Space Odyssey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Arthur C. Clarke,&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sentinel_(short_story)" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt; "The Sentinel"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Arthur C. Clarke, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.foliosociety.com/ca/2001-a-space-odyssey.html" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;2001: A Space Odyssey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (novel)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_Greenberg" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Clement Greenberg&lt;/a&gt;, American art critic &lt;br&gt;
Stanley Kubrick (dir.), &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081505/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Shining&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Sergei Eisenstein, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Film-Form-Essays-Theory/dp/0156309203/ref=pd_lpo_14_t_0/147-0144282-1131014?_encoding=UTF8&amp;amp;pd_rd_i=0156309203&amp;amp;pd_rd_r=37cf94c0-adb2-4fc2-bbfa-91b00773da7f&amp;amp;pd_rd_w=CdtxC&amp;amp;pd_rd_wg=jkLXJ&amp;amp;pf_rd_p=7b36d496-f366-4631-94d3-61b87b52511b&amp;amp;pf_rd_r=9KCP3Y7C1RPE4XDH7N9D&amp;amp;psc=1&amp;amp;refRID=9KCP3Y7C1RPE4XDH7N9D" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Film Form: Essays in Film Theory&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Weird Studies episode 62: It's Like "The Shining," But With Nuns: On "Black Narcissus"&lt;br&gt;
Ligeti, &lt;em&gt;Atmosphères&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Gerard Loughlin, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://books.google.ca/books?id=5WZwCtrqJ8kC&amp;amp;pg=PA73&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Alien Sex: The Body and Desire in Cinema and Theology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Jay Weidner, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Kubricks-Odyssey-Secrets-Hidden-Films/dp/B004PF0FJM" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Kubrick's Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Rob Ager's &lt;a href="https://www.collativelearning.com/2001%20analysis%20new.html" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;analysis&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;em&gt;2001&lt;/em&gt; (Ager was criticized for not citing Loughlin above)&lt;br&gt;
Eric Norton's &lt;em&gt;Playboy&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href="https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2016/10/02/playboy-interview-stanley-kubrick/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt; with Stanley Kubrick&lt;br&gt;
J. F. Martel, &lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Toward-2012-Perspectives-Next-Age/dp/B002PJ4L72" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"The Kubrick Gaze"&lt;/a&gt; in Daniel Pinchbeck &amp;amp; Ken Jordan (eds.), &lt;em&gt;Toward 2012: Perspectives on the Next Age&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
J. F. Martel, &lt;a href="https://realitysandwich.com/149962/the-future-is-immanent-speculations-on-a-possible-world/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"The Future is Immanent: Speculations on a Possible World"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Henri Bergson, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bergson/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Two Sources of Morality and Religion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Sid Meier's &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://civilization.com/civilization-5/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Civilization V&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Stanley Kubrick (dir.), &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057012/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Dr Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Stanley Kubrick (dir.), &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066921/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;A Clockwork Orange&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Dziga Vertov, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Kino-Eye-Writings-Dziga-Vertov/dp/0520056302" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Kino-Eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Marshall McLuhan, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understanding_Media" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Understanding Media&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Martin Heidegger, &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Question_Concerning_Technology" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"The Question Concerning Technology"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Gilbert Ryle, &lt;a href="https://academic.oup.com/mind/article-abstract/LXXXV/337/69/974404?redirectedFrom=PDF" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"Improvisation"&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Kubrick, 2001, meaning, monolith, star child, god, transcendence, cinema</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>"You don't find reality only in your own backyard, you know," Stanley Kubrick once told an interviewer. "In fact, sometimes that's the last place you'll find it." Oddly, this episode of Weird Studies begins with Phil Ford hatching the idea of putting a replica of the  monolith from <em>2001</em> in his backyard. As the ensuing discussion suggests, this would amount to putting reality -- or the Real, as we like to call it -- in the place where it may be least apparent. Perhaps that is what Kubrick did when he planted his monolithic film in thousands of movie theatres back in 1968. Moviegoers went in expecting a Kubrickian twist on <em>Buck Rogers</em>; they came out <em>changed</em> by the experience, much like the hominids of great veld in the "Dawn of Man" sequence that opens the film. This is what all great art does, and if you look closely, maybe <em>2001</em> can tell you something about how it does it. Because in the end, the film <em>is</em> the  monolith, and the monolith is all art.</p>

<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>

<p>Stanley Kubrick (dir.), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/" rel="nofollow noopener">2001: A Space Odyssey</a></em><br>
Arthur C. Clarke,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sentinel_(short_story)" rel="nofollow noopener"> "The Sentinel"</a><br>
Arthur C. Clarke, <em><a href="https://www.foliosociety.com/ca/2001-a-space-odyssey.html" rel="nofollow noopener">2001: A Space Odyssey</a></em> (novel)<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_Greenberg" rel="nofollow noopener">Clement Greenberg</a>, American art critic <br>
Stanley Kubrick (dir.), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081505/" rel="nofollow noopener">The Shining</a></em><br>
Sergei Eisenstein, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Film-Form-Essays-Theory/dp/0156309203/ref=pd_lpo_14_t_0/147-0144282-1131014?_encoding=UTF8&amp;pd_rd_i=0156309203&amp;pd_rd_r=37cf94c0-adb2-4fc2-bbfa-91b00773da7f&amp;pd_rd_w=CdtxC&amp;pd_rd_wg=jkLXJ&amp;pf_rd_p=7b36d496-f366-4631-94d3-61b87b52511b&amp;pf_rd_r=9KCP3Y7C1RPE4XDH7N9D&amp;psc=1&amp;refRID=9KCP3Y7C1RPE4XDH7N9D" rel="nofollow noopener">Film Form: Essays in Film Theory</a></em><br>
Weird Studies episode 62: It's Like "The Shining," But With Nuns: On "Black Narcissus"<br>
Ligeti, <em>Atmosphères</em><br>
Gerard Loughlin, <em><a href="https://books.google.ca/books?id=5WZwCtrqJ8kC&amp;pg=PA73&amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow noopener">Alien Sex: The Body and Desire in Cinema and Theology</a></em><br>
Jay Weidner, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Kubricks-Odyssey-Secrets-Hidden-Films/dp/B004PF0FJM" rel="nofollow noopener">Kubrick's Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick</a></em><br>
Rob Ager's <a href="https://www.collativelearning.com/2001%20analysis%20new.html" rel="nofollow noopener">analysis</a> of <em>2001</em> (Ager was criticized for not citing Loughlin above)<br>
Eric Norton's <em>Playboy</em> <a href="https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2016/10/02/playboy-interview-stanley-kubrick/" rel="nofollow noopener">interview</a> with Stanley Kubrick<br>
J. F. Martel, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Toward-2012-Perspectives-Next-Age/dp/B002PJ4L72" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Kubrick Gaze"</a> in Daniel Pinchbeck &amp; Ken Jordan (eds.), <em>Toward 2012: Perspectives on the Next Age</em><br>
J. F. Martel, <a href="https://realitysandwich.com/149962/the-future-is-immanent-speculations-on-a-possible-world/" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Future is Immanent: Speculations on a Possible World"</a><br>
Henri Bergson, <em><a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bergson/" rel="nofollow noopener">The Two Sources of Morality and Religion</a></em><br>
Sid Meier's <em><a href="https://civilization.com/civilization-5/" rel="nofollow noopener">Civilization V</a></em><br>
Stanley Kubrick (dir.), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057012/" rel="nofollow noopener">Dr Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb</a></em><br>
Stanley Kubrick (dir.), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066921/" rel="nofollow noopener">A Clockwork Orange</a></em><br>
Dziga Vertov, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Kino-Eye-Writings-Dziga-Vertov/dp/0520056302" rel="nofollow noopener">Kino-Eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov</a></em><br>
Marshall McLuhan, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understanding_Media" rel="nofollow noopener">Understanding Media</a></em><br>
Martin Heidegger, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Question_Concerning_Technology" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Question Concerning Technology"</a><br>
Gilbert Ryle, <a href="https://academic.oup.com/mind/article-abstract/LXXXV/337/69/974404?redirectedFrom=PDF" rel="nofollow noopener">"Improvisation"</a></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>"You don't find reality only in your own backyard, you know," Stanley Kubrick once told an interviewer. "In fact, sometimes that's the last place you'll find it." Oddly, this episode of Weird Studies begins with Phil Ford hatching the idea of putting a replica of the  monolith from <em>2001</em> in his backyard. As the ensuing discussion suggests, this would amount to putting reality -- or the Real, as we like to call it -- in the place where it may be least apparent. Perhaps that is what Kubrick did when he planted his monolithic film in thousands of movie theatres back in 1968. Moviegoers went in expecting a Kubrickian twist on <em>Buck Rogers</em>; they came out <em>changed</em> by the experience, much like the hominids of great veld in the "Dawn of Man" sequence that opens the film. This is what all great art does, and if you look closely, maybe <em>2001</em> can tell you something about how it does it. Because in the end, the film <em>is</em> the  monolith, and the monolith is all art.</p>

<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>

<p>Stanley Kubrick (dir.), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/" rel="nofollow noopener">2001: A Space Odyssey</a></em><br>
Arthur C. Clarke,<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sentinel_(short_story)" rel="nofollow noopener"> "The Sentinel"</a><br>
Arthur C. Clarke, <em><a href="https://www.foliosociety.com/ca/2001-a-space-odyssey.html" rel="nofollow noopener">2001: A Space Odyssey</a></em> (novel)<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_Greenberg" rel="nofollow noopener">Clement Greenberg</a>, American art critic <br>
Stanley Kubrick (dir.), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081505/" rel="nofollow noopener">The Shining</a></em><br>
Sergei Eisenstein, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Film-Form-Essays-Theory/dp/0156309203/ref=pd_lpo_14_t_0/147-0144282-1131014?_encoding=UTF8&amp;pd_rd_i=0156309203&amp;pd_rd_r=37cf94c0-adb2-4fc2-bbfa-91b00773da7f&amp;pd_rd_w=CdtxC&amp;pd_rd_wg=jkLXJ&amp;pf_rd_p=7b36d496-f366-4631-94d3-61b87b52511b&amp;pf_rd_r=9KCP3Y7C1RPE4XDH7N9D&amp;psc=1&amp;refRID=9KCP3Y7C1RPE4XDH7N9D" rel="nofollow noopener">Film Form: Essays in Film Theory</a></em><br>
Weird Studies episode 62: It's Like "The Shining," But With Nuns: On "Black Narcissus"<br>
Ligeti, <em>Atmosphères</em><br>
Gerard Loughlin, <em><a href="https://books.google.ca/books?id=5WZwCtrqJ8kC&amp;pg=PA73&amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow noopener">Alien Sex: The Body and Desire in Cinema and Theology</a></em><br>
Jay Weidner, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.ca/Kubricks-Odyssey-Secrets-Hidden-Films/dp/B004PF0FJM" rel="nofollow noopener">Kubrick's Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick</a></em><br>
Rob Ager's <a href="https://www.collativelearning.com/2001%20analysis%20new.html" rel="nofollow noopener">analysis</a> of <em>2001</em> (Ager was criticized for not citing Loughlin above)<br>
Eric Norton's <em>Playboy</em> <a href="https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2016/10/02/playboy-interview-stanley-kubrick/" rel="nofollow noopener">interview</a> with Stanley Kubrick<br>
J. F. Martel, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Toward-2012-Perspectives-Next-Age/dp/B002PJ4L72" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Kubrick Gaze"</a> in Daniel Pinchbeck &amp; Ken Jordan (eds.), <em>Toward 2012: Perspectives on the Next Age</em><br>
J. F. Martel, <a href="https://realitysandwich.com/149962/the-future-is-immanent-speculations-on-a-possible-world/" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Future is Immanent: Speculations on a Possible World"</a><br>
Henri Bergson, <em><a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bergson/" rel="nofollow noopener">The Two Sources of Morality and Religion</a></em><br>
Sid Meier's <em><a href="https://civilization.com/civilization-5/" rel="nofollow noopener">Civilization V</a></em><br>
Stanley Kubrick (dir.), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057012/" rel="nofollow noopener">Dr Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb</a></em><br>
Stanley Kubrick (dir.), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066921/" rel="nofollow noopener">A Clockwork Orange</a></em><br>
Dziga Vertov, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Kino-Eye-Writings-Dziga-Vertov/dp/0520056302" rel="nofollow noopener">Kino-Eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov</a></em><br>
Marshall McLuhan, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understanding_Media" rel="nofollow noopener">Understanding Media</a></em><br>
Martin Heidegger, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Question_Concerning_Technology" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Question Concerning Technology"</a><br>
Gilbert Ryle, <a href="https://academic.oup.com/mind/article-abstract/LXXXV/337/69/974404?redirectedFrom=PDF" rel="nofollow noopener">"Improvisation"</a></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 30: On Stanley Kubrick's 'Eyes Wide Shut'</title>
  <link>https://www.weirdstudies.com/30</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">eceb2a86-a426-4bab-b2e3-63912c6d8865</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2018 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/eceb2a86-a426-4bab-b2e3-63912c6d8865.mp3" length="80233595" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>On Stanley Kubrick's 'Eyes Wide Shut'</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Phil and JF discuss Stanley Kubrick's final masterpiece.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:06:26</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;No dream is ever just a dream. Or so Tom Cruises tells Nicole Kidman at the end of &lt;em&gt;Eyes Wide Shut&lt;/em&gt;. In this episode, Phil and JF expound some of the key themes of Kubrick's film, a masterpiece of cinematic chamber music that demonstrates, with painstaking attention to detail, Zen Master Dōgen's utterance that when one side of the world is illuminated, the other side is dark. Treading a winding path between wakefulness and dream, love and sex, life and art, your paranoid hosts make boldly for that secret spot where the rainbow ends, and the masks come off. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;REFERENCES&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Arthur Schnitzler, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_Story" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Dream Story (Traumnovelle)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; -- Source of the EWS screenplay, sadly overlooked in the episode but well worth a read. &lt;br&gt;
Frederic Raphael, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Eyes-Wide-Open-Stanley-Kubrick/dp/0345437764" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Eyes Wide Open: A Memoir of Stanley Kubrick&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathysphere" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Bathysphere&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Frank L. Baum, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wonderful_Wizard_of_Oz" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Wonderful Wizard of Oz&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
David Icke's &lt;a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-politics-36339298/david-icke-on-9-11-and-lizards-in-buckingham-palace-theories" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"reptilian" theory of the British Royal Family&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Thomas A. Nelson, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Kubrick-Inside-Film-Artists-Midland/dp/0253202833" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Kubrick: Inside a Film Artist's Maze&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://uploads.fireside.fm/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/14VBmkoF.png" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Screenshot&lt;/a&gt; of newspaper article from &lt;em&gt;Eyes Wide Shut&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Rodney Ascher, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.nfb.ca/film/room_237/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Room 237&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
James Hillman,&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Pan-Nightmare-James-Hillman/dp/0882142259" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Pan and the Nightmare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
Gustave Moreau,&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Apparition" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;L'Apparition&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Mario Praz, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.13207/2015.13207.The-Romantic-Agony_djvu.txt" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Romantic Agony&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
William S. Burroughs, “On Coincidence,” in&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Adding-Machine-William-S-Burroughs/dp/0802121950" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Adding Machine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
J.F. Martel, &lt;a href="http://realitysandwich.com/149960/the-kubrick-gaze/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"The Kubrick Gaze"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>kubrick, eyes wide shut, analysis</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>No dream is ever just a dream. Or so Tom Cruises tells Nicole Kidman at the end of <em>Eyes Wide Shut</em>. In this episode, Phil and JF expound some of the key themes of Kubrick's film, a masterpiece of cinematic chamber music that demonstrates, with painstaking attention to detail, Zen Master Dōgen's utterance that when one side of the world is illuminated, the other side is dark. Treading a winding path between wakefulness and dream, love and sex, life and art, your paranoid hosts make boldly for that secret spot where the rainbow ends, and the masks come off. </p>

<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>

<p>Arthur Schnitzler, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_Story" rel="nofollow noopener">Dream Story (Traumnovelle)</a></em> -- Source of the EWS screenplay, sadly overlooked in the episode but well worth a read. <br>
Frederic Raphael, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Eyes-Wide-Open-Stanley-Kubrick/dp/0345437764" rel="nofollow noopener">Eyes Wide Open: A Memoir of Stanley Kubrick</a></em><br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathysphere" rel="nofollow noopener">Bathysphere</a>&nbsp;<br>
Frank L. Baum, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wonderful_Wizard_of_Oz" rel="nofollow noopener">The Wonderful Wizard of Oz</a></em><br>
David Icke's <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-politics-36339298/david-icke-on-9-11-and-lizards-in-buckingham-palace-theories" rel="nofollow noopener">"reptilian" theory of the British Royal Family</a>&nbsp;<br>
Thomas A. Nelson, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Kubrick-Inside-Film-Artists-Midland/dp/0253202833" rel="nofollow noopener">Kubrick: Inside a Film Artist's Maze</a></em> <br>
<a href="https://uploads.fireside.fm/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/14VBmkoF.png" rel="nofollow noopener">Screenshot</a> of newspaper article from <em>Eyes Wide Shut</em><br>
Rodney Ascher, <em><a href="https://www.nfb.ca/film/room_237/" rel="nofollow noopener">Room 237</a></em><br>
James Hillman,&nbsp;<em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Pan-Nightmare-James-Hillman/dp/0882142259" rel="nofollow noopener">Pan and the Nightmare</a></em>&nbsp;<br>
Gustave Moreau,&nbsp;<em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Apparition" rel="nofollow noopener">L'Apparition</a></em><br>
Mario Praz, <em><a href="https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.13207/2015.13207.The-Romantic-Agony_djvu.txt" rel="nofollow noopener">The Romantic Agony</a></em><br>
William S. Burroughs, “On Coincidence,” in&nbsp;<em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Adding-Machine-William-S-Burroughs/dp/0802121950" rel="nofollow noopener">The Adding Machine</a></em><br>
J.F. Martel, <a href="http://realitysandwich.com/149960/the-kubrick-gaze/" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Kubrick Gaze"</a></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>No dream is ever just a dream. Or so Tom Cruises tells Nicole Kidman at the end of <em>Eyes Wide Shut</em>. In this episode, Phil and JF expound some of the key themes of Kubrick's film, a masterpiece of cinematic chamber music that demonstrates, with painstaking attention to detail, Zen Master Dōgen's utterance that when one side of the world is illuminated, the other side is dark. Treading a winding path between wakefulness and dream, love and sex, life and art, your paranoid hosts make boldly for that secret spot where the rainbow ends, and the masks come off. </p>

<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>

<p>Arthur Schnitzler, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_Story" rel="nofollow noopener">Dream Story (Traumnovelle)</a></em> -- Source of the EWS screenplay, sadly overlooked in the episode but well worth a read. <br>
Frederic Raphael, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Eyes-Wide-Open-Stanley-Kubrick/dp/0345437764" rel="nofollow noopener">Eyes Wide Open: A Memoir of Stanley Kubrick</a></em><br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathysphere" rel="nofollow noopener">Bathysphere</a>&nbsp;<br>
Frank L. Baum, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wonderful_Wizard_of_Oz" rel="nofollow noopener">The Wonderful Wizard of Oz</a></em><br>
David Icke's <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-politics-36339298/david-icke-on-9-11-and-lizards-in-buckingham-palace-theories" rel="nofollow noopener">"reptilian" theory of the British Royal Family</a>&nbsp;<br>
Thomas A. Nelson, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Kubrick-Inside-Film-Artists-Midland/dp/0253202833" rel="nofollow noopener">Kubrick: Inside a Film Artist's Maze</a></em> <br>
<a href="https://uploads.fireside.fm/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/14VBmkoF.png" rel="nofollow noopener">Screenshot</a> of newspaper article from <em>Eyes Wide Shut</em><br>
Rodney Ascher, <em><a href="https://www.nfb.ca/film/room_237/" rel="nofollow noopener">Room 237</a></em><br>
James Hillman,&nbsp;<em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Pan-Nightmare-James-Hillman/dp/0882142259" rel="nofollow noopener">Pan and the Nightmare</a></em>&nbsp;<br>
Gustave Moreau,&nbsp;<em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Apparition" rel="nofollow noopener">L'Apparition</a></em><br>
Mario Praz, <em><a href="https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.13207/2015.13207.The-Romantic-Agony_djvu.txt" rel="nofollow noopener">The Romantic Agony</a></em><br>
William S. Burroughs, “On Coincidence,” in&nbsp;<em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Adding-Machine-William-S-Burroughs/dp/0802121950" rel="nofollow noopener">The Adding Machine</a></em><br>
J.F. Martel, <a href="http://realitysandwich.com/149960/the-kubrick-gaze/" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Kubrick Gaze"</a></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
