<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 03:02:47 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Weird Studies - Episodes Tagged with “Jung”</title>
    <link>https://www.weirdstudies.com/tags/jung</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 13:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Professor Phil Ford and writer J. F. Martel host a series of conversations on art and philosophy, dwelling on ideas that are hard to think and art that opens up rifts in what we are pleased to call "reality."</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Art and philosophy at the limits of the thinkable</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Professor Phil Ford and writer J. F. Martel host a series of conversations on art and philosophy, dwelling on ideas that are hard to think and art that opens up rifts in what we are pleased to call "reality."</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>weird, art, philosophy</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>admin@weirdstudies.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Arts"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 74: A Luminous Parasite: Jung on Art, Part Two</title>
  <link>https://www.weirdstudies.com/74</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">ad0dbd0e-ed05-4416-8cc8-1b904c5db125</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 13:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/ad0dbd0e-ed05-4416-8cc8-1b904c5db125.mp3" length="68398894" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>74</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>A Luminous Parasite: Jung on Art, Part Two</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>The second part of Phil and JF's discussion C. G. Jung's conception of art.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:11:13</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;In this second part of their exploration of C. G. Jung's essay "On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry," JF and Phil try to discern the psychological and metaphysical implications of the great Swiss psychologist's theory of art. For one, this involves discussing what Jung meant by archetypes, and how these relate to the artists who bring them forth in artistic works.  This  in turn leads to a discussion of the emergent artwork as an "autonomous complex," that is, as a self-moving spirit that requires the artist merely as a conduit for its manifestation in human -- and cosmic -- history. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;REFERENCES&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Carl Gustav Jung, &lt;a href="http://www.studiocleo.com/librarie/jung/essay.html" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Arthur Machen, &lt;a href="https://archive.org/details/hieroglyphicsnot00mach" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"Hieroglyphics: A Note Upon Ecstasy"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Rick Riordan, &lt;em&gt;[Percy Jackson &amp;amp; the Olympians](&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Jackson" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Jackson&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;%26_the_Olympians)_ series of novels&lt;br&gt;
Robert Altman (director), &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073440/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Nashville&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Homer, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odyssey" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Odyssey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Jacques Offenbach, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tales_of_Hoffmann" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Tales of Hoffmann&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
E. T. A. Hoffmann, &lt;a href="http://art3idea.psu.edu/metalepsis/texts/sandman.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"The Sandman"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lynch" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;David Lynch&lt;/a&gt;, American filmmaker (the Dionysian!)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Kubrick" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Stanley Kubrick&lt;/a&gt;, American filmmaker (the Apollonian!)&lt;br&gt;
Richard Wagner's idea of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesamtkunstwerk" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Gesamtkunstwerk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
William S. Burroughs, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_Lunch" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Naked Lunch &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Johannes Vermeer, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.nga.gov/collection/highlights/vermeer-woman-holding-a-balance.html" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Woman Holding a Balance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://www.metapsychosis.com/consciousness-in-the-aesthetic-imagination/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;JF's analysis&lt;/a&gt; thereof&lt;br&gt;
Lisa Ruddick, &lt;a href="https://thepointmag.com/criticism/when-nothing-is-cool/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"When Nothing is Cool"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Weird Studies &lt;a href="https://www.weirdstudies.com/5" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;episode 5&lt;/a&gt;: Reading Lisa Ruddick's "When Nothing is Cool" &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>cg jung, relation analytical psychology poetry, aesthetics, theory of art, archetypes</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>In this second part of their exploration of C. G. Jung's essay "On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry," JF and Phil try to discern the psychological and metaphysical implications of the great Swiss psychologist's theory of art. For one, this involves discussing what Jung meant by archetypes, and how these relate to the artists who bring them forth in artistic works.  This  in turn leads to a discussion of the emergent artwork as an "autonomous complex," that is, as a self-moving spirit that requires the artist merely as a conduit for its manifestation in human -- and cosmic -- history. </p>

<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>

<p>Carl Gustav Jung, <a href="http://www.studiocleo.com/librarie/jung/essay.html" rel="nofollow noopener">"On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry"</a><br>
Arthur Machen, <a href="https://archive.org/details/hieroglyphicsnot00mach" rel="nofollow noopener">"Hieroglyphics: A Note Upon Ecstasy"</a><br>
Rick Riordan, <em>[Percy Jackson &amp; the Olympians](<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Jackson" rel="nofollow noopener">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Jackson</a></em>%26_the_Olympians)_ series of novels<br>
Robert Altman (director), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073440/" rel="nofollow noopener">Nashville</a></em><br>
Homer, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odyssey" rel="nofollow noopener">The Odyssey</a></em><br>
Jacques Offenbach, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tales_of_Hoffmann" rel="nofollow noopener">The Tales of Hoffmann</a></em><br>
E. T. A. Hoffmann, <a href="http://art3idea.psu.edu/metalepsis/texts/sandman.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Sandman"</a><br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lynch" rel="nofollow noopener">David Lynch</a>, American filmmaker (the Dionysian!)<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Kubrick" rel="nofollow noopener">Stanley Kubrick</a>, American filmmaker (the Apollonian!)<br>
Richard Wagner's idea of <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesamtkunstwerk" rel="nofollow noopener">Gesamtkunstwerk</a></em><br>
William S. Burroughs, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_Lunch" rel="nofollow noopener">Naked Lunch </a></em><br>
Johannes Vermeer, <em><a href="https://www.nga.gov/collection/highlights/vermeer-woman-holding-a-balance.html" rel="nofollow noopener">Woman Holding a Balance</a></em>, and <a href="https://www.metapsychosis.com/consciousness-in-the-aesthetic-imagination/" rel="nofollow noopener">JF's analysis</a> thereof<br>
Lisa Ruddick, <a href="https://thepointmag.com/criticism/when-nothing-is-cool/" rel="nofollow noopener">"When Nothing is Cool"</a><br>
Weird Studies <a href="https://www.weirdstudies.com/5" rel="nofollow noopener">episode 5</a>: Reading Lisa Ruddick's "When Nothing is Cool"</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>In this second part of their exploration of C. G. Jung's essay "On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry," JF and Phil try to discern the psychological and metaphysical implications of the great Swiss psychologist's theory of art. For one, this involves discussing what Jung meant by archetypes, and how these relate to the artists who bring them forth in artistic works.  This  in turn leads to a discussion of the emergent artwork as an "autonomous complex," that is, as a self-moving spirit that requires the artist merely as a conduit for its manifestation in human -- and cosmic -- history. </p>

<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>

<p>Carl Gustav Jung, <a href="http://www.studiocleo.com/librarie/jung/essay.html" rel="nofollow noopener">"On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry"</a><br>
Arthur Machen, <a href="https://archive.org/details/hieroglyphicsnot00mach" rel="nofollow noopener">"Hieroglyphics: A Note Upon Ecstasy"</a><br>
Rick Riordan, <em>[Percy Jackson &amp; the Olympians](<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Jackson" rel="nofollow noopener">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Jackson</a></em>%26_the_Olympians)_ series of novels<br>
Robert Altman (director), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073440/" rel="nofollow noopener">Nashville</a></em><br>
Homer, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odyssey" rel="nofollow noopener">The Odyssey</a></em><br>
Jacques Offenbach, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tales_of_Hoffmann" rel="nofollow noopener">The Tales of Hoffmann</a></em><br>
E. T. A. Hoffmann, <a href="http://art3idea.psu.edu/metalepsis/texts/sandman.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener">"The Sandman"</a><br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Lynch" rel="nofollow noopener">David Lynch</a>, American filmmaker (the Dionysian!)<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Kubrick" rel="nofollow noopener">Stanley Kubrick</a>, American filmmaker (the Apollonian!)<br>
Richard Wagner's idea of <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesamtkunstwerk" rel="nofollow noopener">Gesamtkunstwerk</a></em><br>
William S. Burroughs, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_Lunch" rel="nofollow noopener">Naked Lunch </a></em><br>
Johannes Vermeer, <em><a href="https://www.nga.gov/collection/highlights/vermeer-woman-holding-a-balance.html" rel="nofollow noopener">Woman Holding a Balance</a></em>, and <a href="https://www.metapsychosis.com/consciousness-in-the-aesthetic-imagination/" rel="nofollow noopener">JF's analysis</a> thereof<br>
Lisa Ruddick, <a href="https://thepointmag.com/criticism/when-nothing-is-cool/" rel="nofollow noopener">"When Nothing is Cool"</a><br>
Weird Studies <a href="https://www.weirdstudies.com/5" rel="nofollow noopener">episode 5</a>: Reading Lisa Ruddick's "When Nothing is Cool"</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Episode 73: Carl Jung and the Power of Art, Part One</title>
  <link>https://www.weirdstudies.com/73</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">7da88969-0ed4-4e31-9c89-0594be40a34e</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 11:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/7da88969-0ed4-4e31-9c89-0594be40a34e.mp3" length="61684272" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>73</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Carl Jung and the Power of Art, Part One</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Phil Ford and J. F. Martel</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>The first of two conversations in which JF and Phil investigate C. G. Jung's thoughts on the psychology of artistic creation.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:04:12</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>yes</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e38b53e4-e148-4e2d-b301-0b3bb15779ff/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;This is the first of two conversations that Phil and JF are devoting to C. G. Jung's seminal essay, "On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry," first delivered in a 1922 lecture. It was in this text that Jung most clearly distilled his thoughts on the power and function of art. In this first part, your hosts focus their energies on Jung's puralistic style, opposing it not just to Freud's monism (which Jung critiques in the paper) but also to the monism of those other two "masters of suspicion," Marx and Nietzsche. For Jung, art is not a branch of psychology, economics, philosophy, or science. It constitutes its own sphere, and non-artists who would investigate the nature of art would do well to respect the line that art has drawn in the sand. &lt;em&gt;Weird Studies&lt;/em&gt; listenters will know this line as the boundary between the general and the specific, the common and the singular, the mundane and the mystical...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;REFERENCES&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;C. G. Jung, &lt;a href="http://www.studiocleo.com/librarie/jung/essay.html" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;"On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Joshua Gunn, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uapress.ua.edu/product/Modern-Occult-Rhetoric,5019.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Modern Occult Rhetoric: Mass Media and the Drama of Secrecy in the Twentieth Century&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Peter Kingsley, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://peterkingsley.org/product/catafalque/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Catafalque: Carl Jung and the End of Humanity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Sigmund Freud&lt;/a&gt;, Austrian psychologist&lt;br&gt;
Kinka Usher (director), &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0132347/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Mystery Men&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;br&gt;
Theodor Adorno, “Bach Defended Against his Devotees”&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Aleister Crowley&lt;/a&gt;, English magician&lt;br&gt;
C. G. Jung, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://philemonfoundation.org/published-works/red-book/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Red Book: Liber Novus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Bill Moyers and Joseph Campbell, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Myth" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Power of Myth&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
C. G. Jung, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Memories-Dreams-Reflections-Carl-Gustav-ebook/dp/B004FYZK52" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Memories, Dreams, Reflections&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
C. G. Jung, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/Portable-Jung-Library/dp/0140150706/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;amp;keywords=Viking+Portable+Jung&amp;amp;qid=1589374313&amp;amp;s=digital-text&amp;amp;sr=1-1-catcorr" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Portable Jung&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Friedrich Nietzsche, "On the Use and Abuse of History for Life" in: &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Untimely_Meditations" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Untimely Meditations&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Weird Studies, &lt;a href="https://www.weirdstudies.com/49" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;episode 49&lt;/a&gt;: Nietzsche on History&lt;br&gt;
Weird Studies, &lt;a href="https://www.weirdstudies.com/70" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;episode 70&lt;/a&gt;: Masks All the Way Down, with James Curcio&lt;br&gt;
Christian Kerslake, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/deleuze-and-the-unconscious-9781441154996/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Deleuze and the Unconscious&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Joshua Ramey, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-hermetic-deleuze" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;The Hermetic Deleuze: Philosophy and Spiritual Ordeal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ricoeur/" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Paul Ricoeur&lt;/a&gt;, French philosopher&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Steiner" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Rudolph Steiner&lt;/a&gt;, Austrian esotericist &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>psychology, art, jungian, jung, artists, freud</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>This is the first of two conversations that Phil and JF are devoting to C. G. Jung's seminal essay, "On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry," first delivered in a 1922 lecture. It was in this text that Jung most clearly distilled his thoughts on the power and function of art. In this first part, your hosts focus their energies on Jung's puralistic style, opposing it not just to Freud's monism (which Jung critiques in the paper) but also to the monism of those other two "masters of suspicion," Marx and Nietzsche. For Jung, art is not a branch of psychology, economics, philosophy, or science. It constitutes its own sphere, and non-artists who would investigate the nature of art would do well to respect the line that art has drawn in the sand. <em>Weird Studies</em> listenters will know this line as the boundary between the general and the specific, the common and the singular, the mundane and the mystical...</p>

<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>

<p>C. G. Jung, <a href="http://www.studiocleo.com/librarie/jung/essay.html" rel="nofollow noopener">"On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry"</a><br>
Joshua Gunn, <em><a href="http://www.uapress.ua.edu/product/Modern-Occult-Rhetoric,5019.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener">Modern Occult Rhetoric: Mass Media and the Drama of Secrecy in the Twentieth Century</a></em><br>
Peter Kingsley, <em><a href="https://peterkingsley.org/product/catafalque/" rel="nofollow noopener">Catafalque: Carl Jung and the End of Humanity</a></em><br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud" rel="nofollow noopener">Sigmund Freud</a>, Austrian psychologist<br>
Kinka Usher (director), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0132347/" rel="nofollow noopener">Mystery Men</a></em> <br>
Theodor Adorno, “Bach Defended Against his Devotees”<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley" rel="nofollow noopener">Aleister Crowley</a>, English magician<br>
C. G. Jung, <em><a href="https://philemonfoundation.org/published-works/red-book/" rel="nofollow noopener">The Red Book: Liber Novus</a></em><br>
Bill Moyers and Joseph Campbell, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Myth" rel="nofollow noopener">The Power of Myth</a></em><br>
C. G. Jung, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Memories-Dreams-Reflections-Carl-Gustav-ebook/dp/B004FYZK52" rel="nofollow noopener">Memories, Dreams, Reflections</a></em><br>
C. G. Jung, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Portable-Jung-Library/dp/0140150706/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=Viking+Portable+Jung&amp;qid=1589374313&amp;s=digital-text&amp;sr=1-1-catcorr" rel="nofollow noopener">The Portable Jung</a></em><br>
Friedrich Nietzsche, "On the Use and Abuse of History for Life" in: <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Untimely_Meditations" rel="nofollow noopener">Untimely Meditations</a></em><br>
Weird Studies, <a href="https://www.weirdstudies.com/49" rel="nofollow noopener">episode 49</a>: Nietzsche on History<br>
Weird Studies, <a href="https://www.weirdstudies.com/70" rel="nofollow noopener">episode 70</a>: Masks All the Way Down, with James Curcio<br>
Christian Kerslake, <em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/deleuze-and-the-unconscious-9781441154996/" rel="nofollow noopener">Deleuze and the Unconscious</a></em><br>
Joshua Ramey, <em><a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-hermetic-deleuze" rel="nofollow noopener">The Hermetic Deleuze: Philosophy and Spiritual Ordeal</a></em><br>
<a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ricoeur/" rel="nofollow noopener">Paul Ricoeur</a>, French philosopher<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Steiner" rel="nofollow noopener">Rudolph Steiner</a>, Austrian esotericist</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>This is the first of two conversations that Phil and JF are devoting to C. G. Jung's seminal essay, "On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry," first delivered in a 1922 lecture. It was in this text that Jung most clearly distilled his thoughts on the power and function of art. In this first part, your hosts focus their energies on Jung's puralistic style, opposing it not just to Freud's monism (which Jung critiques in the paper) but also to the monism of those other two "masters of suspicion," Marx and Nietzsche. For Jung, art is not a branch of psychology, economics, philosophy, or science. It constitutes its own sphere, and non-artists who would investigate the nature of art would do well to respect the line that art has drawn in the sand. <em>Weird Studies</em> listenters will know this line as the boundary between the general and the specific, the common and the singular, the mundane and the mystical...</p>

<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>

<p>C. G. Jung, <a href="http://www.studiocleo.com/librarie/jung/essay.html" rel="nofollow noopener">"On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry"</a><br>
Joshua Gunn, <em><a href="http://www.uapress.ua.edu/product/Modern-Occult-Rhetoric,5019.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener">Modern Occult Rhetoric: Mass Media and the Drama of Secrecy in the Twentieth Century</a></em><br>
Peter Kingsley, <em><a href="https://peterkingsley.org/product/catafalque/" rel="nofollow noopener">Catafalque: Carl Jung and the End of Humanity</a></em><br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud" rel="nofollow noopener">Sigmund Freud</a>, Austrian psychologist<br>
Kinka Usher (director), <em><a href="https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0132347/" rel="nofollow noopener">Mystery Men</a></em> <br>
Theodor Adorno, “Bach Defended Against his Devotees”<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleister_Crowley" rel="nofollow noopener">Aleister Crowley</a>, English magician<br>
C. G. Jung, <em><a href="https://philemonfoundation.org/published-works/red-book/" rel="nofollow noopener">The Red Book: Liber Novus</a></em><br>
Bill Moyers and Joseph Campbell, <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Myth" rel="nofollow noopener">The Power of Myth</a></em><br>
C. G. Jung, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Memories-Dreams-Reflections-Carl-Gustav-ebook/dp/B004FYZK52" rel="nofollow noopener">Memories, Dreams, Reflections</a></em><br>
C. G. Jung, <em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Portable-Jung-Library/dp/0140150706/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=Viking+Portable+Jung&amp;qid=1589374313&amp;s=digital-text&amp;sr=1-1-catcorr" rel="nofollow noopener">The Portable Jung</a></em><br>
Friedrich Nietzsche, "On the Use and Abuse of History for Life" in: <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Untimely_Meditations" rel="nofollow noopener">Untimely Meditations</a></em><br>
Weird Studies, <a href="https://www.weirdstudies.com/49" rel="nofollow noopener">episode 49</a>: Nietzsche on History<br>
Weird Studies, <a href="https://www.weirdstudies.com/70" rel="nofollow noopener">episode 70</a>: Masks All the Way Down, with James Curcio<br>
Christian Kerslake, <em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/deleuze-and-the-unconscious-9781441154996/" rel="nofollow noopener">Deleuze and the Unconscious</a></em><br>
Joshua Ramey, <em><a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-hermetic-deleuze" rel="nofollow noopener">The Hermetic Deleuze: Philosophy and Spiritual Ordeal</a></em><br>
<a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ricoeur/" rel="nofollow noopener">Paul Ricoeur</a>, French philosopher<br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Steiner" rel="nofollow noopener">Rudolph Steiner</a>, Austrian esotericist</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
